news Canadian News
Good Afternoon Guest | login or register
  • Home
    • Canadian News
    • Popular News
    • News Voting Log
    • News Images
  • Forums
    • Recent Topics Scroll
    •  
    • Politics Forums
    • Sports Forums
    • Regional Forums
  • Content
    • Achievements
    • Canadian Content
    • Famous Canadians
    • Famous Quotes
    • Jokes
    • Canadian Maps
  • Photos
    • Picture Gallery
    • Wallpapers
    • Recent Activity
  • About
    • About
    • Contact
    • Link to Us
    • Points
    • Statistics
  • Shop
  • Register
    • Gold Membership
  • Archive
    • Canadian TV
    • Canadian Webcams
    • Groups
    • Links
    • Top 10's
    • Reviews
    • CKA Radio
    • Video
    • Weather

Trudeau children's nannies being paid for by ta

Canadian Content
20824news upnews down
Link Related to Canada in some say

Trudeau children's nannies being paid for by taxpayers


Political | 208244 hits | Nov 30 10:32 pm | Posted by: andyt
41 Comment

Canadian taxpayers are paying the wages of two nannies hired to care for the children of Prime Minister Justin Trudeau, after he said repeatedly during the election campaign that wealthy families like his should be paying for childcare themselves.

Comments

  1. by OnTheIce
    Tue Dec 01, 2015 3:18 pm
    Imagine if Harper did this? Gasp!

  2. by avatar redhatmamma
    Tue Dec 01, 2015 3:37 pm
    I can only imagine the spew of vitriol...

  3. by avatar BeaverFever
    Tue Dec 01, 2015 3:54 pm
    So? Harper employed domestic staff as well - what's the difference?

  4. by OnTheIce
    Tue Dec 01, 2015 3:56 pm
    "BeaverFever" said
    So? Harper employed domestic staff as well - what's the difference?


    Compare apples to apples, Beav.

    Harper had nannies for his children?

  5. by Lemmy
    Tue Dec 01, 2015 4:05 pm
    Oh my god! Being prime minister of Canada is a job with some perks. The horror. Word has it that he gets free rides around too. Where will the taxpayer abuse end?

  6. by Thanos
    Tue Dec 01, 2015 4:10 pm
    Actually all signs so far indicate that the taxpayer abuse is just getting started, like with $700 million slated for one shipyard that in five years might be capable of producing one ship. This thing with the nannies though isn't worth the time it takes to talk about it.

  7. by avatar BartSimpson  Gold Member
    Tue Dec 01, 2015 4:11 pm
    "BeaverFever" said
    So? Harper employed domestic staff as well - what's the difference?


    This:

    The disclosure comes after an election campaign where Trudeau repeatedly attacked the Conservatives' enhanced universal child care benefit, or UCCB, and income splitting for families, arguing rich families like his and former prime minister Stephen Harper's didn't need taxpayers' help.

    "In these times, Mr. Harper's top priority is to give wealthy families like his and mine $2,000," Trudeau said in reference to the Conservatives' income-splitting tax credit. "Let me tell you something: We don't need it. And Canada can't afford it."

  8. by Lemmy
    Tue Dec 01, 2015 4:12 pm
    "Thanos" said
    Actually all signs so far indicate that the taxpayer abuse is just getting started, like with $700 million slated for one shipyard that in five years might be capable of producing one ship. This thing with the nannies though isn't worth the time it takes to talk about it.

    Just getting started? It started July 1, 1867 and has continued right to this day, with absolutely no variation based on the party in power.

  9. by Thanos
    Tue Dec 01, 2015 4:16 pm
    Give it enough time on the big spending issues. Within two years the Liberals will be so deeply entrenched back into their old Shawinigan two-step habits that it'll make the Harper years look like a golden era of responsible spending in comparison. But Harper was the devil because he wasn't cuddly or selfie-tastic and all that other important feels sort of stuff! Yup, welcome to life under the rule of Generation Pussy. :roll:

  10. by avatar Winnipegger
    Tue Dec 01, 2015 5:04 pm
    Jean Chr�tien chose not to use one of the Airbus aircraft purchase by Mulroney to fly around. Instead, he used one of the Challenger business jets purchased for government ministers. A lot smaller, a lot cheaper. Airbus are designated CC-150 Polaris, 2 configured for mid-air refuelling tankers, 3 can be configured with economy class seats to transport troops, or beds for medevac, or empty for cargo. They have the same large side door for cargo as a Fed-Ex aircraft. One of those 3 has been configured with leather seats, etc, for the PM. Chr�tien chose to leave that aircraft for the troops, but Harper wanted the big one. He wanted something that looks a Canadian version of Air Force One. Will Trudeau chose to be frugal like Chr�tien?

  11. by avatar BeaverFever
    Tue Dec 01, 2015 5:08 pm
    "OnTheIce" said
    So? Harper employed domestic staff as well - what's the difference?


    Compare apples to apples, Beav.

    Harper had nannies for his children?

    Harpers kids are teenagers so it's not apples to apples.

  12. by avatar andyt
    Tue Dec 01, 2015 5:09 pm
    They were grade schoolers when he came to power, as I recall. I think Trudeau should stand by his words and hire his own nannies.

  13. by avatar BeaverFever
    Tue Dec 01, 2015 5:11 pm
    "BartSimpson" said
    So? Harper employed domestic staff as well - what's the difference?


    This:

    The disclosure comes after an election campaign where Trudeau repeatedly attacked the Conservatives' enhanced universal child care benefit, or UCCB, and income splitting for families, arguing rich families like his and former prime minister Stephen Harper's didn't need taxpayers' help.

    "In these times, Mr. Harper's top priority is to give wealthy families like his and mine $2,000," Trudeau said in reference to the Conservatives' income-splitting tax credit. "Let me tell you something: We don't need it. And Canada can't afford it."


    Rich families like his don't need a personal chef or housekeeper either, yet every PM gets one.

    That said, I'm not necessarily opposed to him having to pay out of pocket but its unfair to say chefs and maids and gardeners are ok, but not nannies.

  14. by avatar martin14
    Tue Dec 01, 2015 5:16 pm
    "Thanos" said
    Give it enough time on the big spending issues. Within two years the Liberals will be so deeply entrenched back into their old Shawinigan two-step habits that it'll make the Harper years look like a golden era of responsible spending in comparison. But Harper was the devil because he wasn't cuddly or selfie-tastic and all that other important feels sort of stuff! Yup, welcome to life under the rule of Generation Pussy. :roll:



    They wasted no time at all getting back into the trough.

    My guess, you ain't seen nothing yet. :lol:



view comments in forum
Page 1 2 3

You need to be a member of CKA and be logged into the site, to comment on news.

  • Login
  • Register (free)
 Share  Digg It Bookmark to del.icio.us Share on Facebook


Share on Facebook Submit page to Reddit
CKA About |  Legal |  Advertise |  Sitemap |  Contact   canadian mobile newsMobile

All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their respective owner.
The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © 2025 by Canadaka.net